| Forum: Proposals > Admin/Rollback Vote - Zak's Return |
|---|
Okay, here it is, the final vote about Zakkoroean. Only admins and rollbacks are allowed to vote about him returning or not. This voting poll ends on the 14th of September!
Return
- He's done his time, he deserves to come back, and he has promised to follow stricter rules. --Nalyd Renrut - Legendary Snipe! Master of epic pwnage 19:48, September 9, 2009 (UTC)
- Guys. Your being so mean to him right now. He gets banned and now your nearly cursing at him. And now your willing to ban him from anther wiki? C'mon guys, Zak is a helpful user, and hes been through a lot. You guys are the ones being mean to him. I hate pointing out names, but you, Webkinz Mania, of all people are being so cruel to him. --The Greatest Codyfan that ever lived! 18:02, September 12, 2009 (UTC)
Stay Banned
- For the good of the wiki as a whole, I don't think he should come back. He caused lots of issues on the wiki, and he didn't get along well with many of the users. Yes, he didn't purposly try to cause issues, but he didn't really seem to listen to the other users very well, especially with the whole Shipping deal. I'm sorry, Zakkoreon, if you are reading this, but I just think it will be better for everyone if you stay banned. I may be wrong, but I stick to my opinion based on past events. --Freehugs41♥Talk 19:53, September 9, 2009 (UTC)
- We had the trial, if he returns, we wasted our night. We gave him many chances. BTW, if Zak doesn't return, nobody better make a peep about this again!!! WM+Peace says stuff 19:59, September 9, 2009 (UTC)
- OMG. Oh, come on guys. We've already had the trial. We know what he's capable of. He's caused conflict, dispute, or some kind of disagreement problem with nearly everyone he's talked to on here (including myself, when I was of higher power than he was). He deserves to stay banned; friendship really can't get in the way of all of this. Granted, Shipping may be gone, but if you'll notice, we're STILL getting rid of links to the pages (we are trying to make it where it never came into existence [plus he never stayed to try and clean it up, so that motes some kind of "My way or the Highway" vibe in a sense]). He's broken far too many rules and has had too many chances. Usually, I'm a "Forgive & Forget" kind of person, but his actions have went past that. Please get real, people. ~ BB ~ Talk to the Gaffer! Count It! Thanks! 21:06, September 9, 2009 (UTC)
- I have checked his talkpage... there are some conflicts in it. I don't get the "opportunity" to know him, but I don't think it is a good idea to give another chance to someone who already received one. Sorry.----DJ Fan! 23:57, September 9, 2009 (UTC)
- From the way he treated me, the unreliability of his testimony, his constant arguments and whatnot, I don't trust him. The Trial was supposedly the FINAL VOTE of him. I'm tired of giving him chances he doesn't deserve. I don't care how strict his rules are, ours are stricter. YOU'RE PERM BANNED, YOU LOST YOUR CHANCE. Adios, amigos! - José Talk to me! Gracias! 00:01, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
- I know this may be a bit late, but I'm casting my vote for him to Stay Banned. I do this out of no personal grudge or feelings one way or another towards Zak, since I admit I missed the trial and just reading a few talk pages could only fill in so much. Regardless, it seems that the users determined for him to become banned and therefor we should uphold this decision. Rules are rules, and it's difficult to make one exception without having to look back on other users who may have been wrongfully banned. So I think that we should stay by you're previous decision, if only because its the most fair to most of the users of the wiki who may not be close enough with the admins to even be given a second chance in an event such as this. Gamechamp11 07:00, September 11, 2009 (UTC)